I understood you to be saying that some women have natural tendency towards fields that were historically typified as belonging to the men and that a balance needs to be found between these tendencies and religious gender obligation.
What I am saying is that being a “natural tendency” does not legitimize a negative character trait.
After re-reading what you wrote, I wonder if you were just saying that women are just as smart as men albeit generally (but not exclusively) in a different way. If that is the case, then I agree with you.
If that was not the case, then I found your position to be too abstract and would appreciate a more concrete explanation and/or example.