Wolf, I think nameless meant, a “dont be fooled by fooled by appearances” thing. Dont nix someone just because they were already engaged. (At the same time I understand the other side of the coin. What was there that was bad enough to cause one side to break it?)
I’m not sure if this is a new thing or what. B”H, I dont know too much about broken engagements. There used to be a “thing,” when someone would ask why it was broken, they would say it was mutual. I heard, within the past three months of two engagements that were broken because the other side got “cold feet.” Is this supposed to sound more believable then “it was mutual” if it will become the accepted terminology?