GAW wrote:
“Expect to soon see many same gender (which may not be blocked by incest laws) “marriages” between parents and their children for both tax and benefits purposes. I can’t see any acountant worth their salt not using this ruling to get around estate taxes.”
This comment is so off-base and silly I don’t even know where to begin.
The slippery slope argument is a bad and unconvincing argument. Just argue against Toeiva marriage and/or state regulation of marriage. It has nothing to do with parents marrying their kids, people marrying dogs, etc.