@benignuman wrote:
“heretohelp,
It depends on how you use the “slipperly slope” argument. Arguing because we allowed A we will allow B is unconvincing.
Arguing that just as you agree we can prohibit B, we can also prohibit A is a convincing argument.”
Only if A and B are similar. Nobody reasonable thinks that marrying a dog is similar to marrying a person, even if the person is a toievanik.