“Your posts are getting more & more laughable. Who cares that he’s not a real journalist or that he is biased? He wrote an article, nothing more. My point was what was in the article. You claim you read the article, but besides cursing out Westen, you have Not refuted any of the scientific points of the article.”
If a) he is not a real journalist and b) he is biased then it logically follows that c) a reasonable person cannot trust that the article contains accurate information. I never cursed out anyone.
“I never said research is one way or another. What I was saying was some research is Pro the Gay agenda and some of it is against the Gay Agenda!”
Please reread what you just wrote. I think you are proving my point.
“By continually basing your opinions on Only the research that is Pro the Gay agenda and Not even looking at All the research, then I’ll continue to paint you as a liberal gay activist who’s selective in what research to promote.”
By continually basing your opinions on Only the research that is Anti the Gay agenda and Not even looking at All the research, then I’ll continue to paint you as a conservative extremist who’s selective in what research to promote.
Hey, what’s with all the random initial caps, anyway?