Philospher said,
“The truth is whatever true argument I will bring forth will not please you because you are set in your thinking so what’s the use of going back and forth…I have the answers so you need not post yours.”
So then who is set in their way of thinking and is not open to changing it?
I originaly thought the way you do but changed my mind after actually seeing both sides of the arguments.
Have you actualy looked into and researched these “proofs”? (BTW by “looked into” I dont mean read a book by someone who agrees with your preconceived view of things and how they portray their opponent’s arguments.)Or have you simply decided they are good proofs because you read a book by somone who thinks so, or havnt thought of any way to disprove them yourself?