BYM stated: There were no overarching objectives in what we were taught. Definitely no reasoning skills beyond a fifth-grade level. We are taught – the facts. And the “proofs” given from the text to support whatever it was were at best, weak. Many times, they seemed non-sensical to me. In fact, I remember as a kid thinking that I could also “make up a proof like that”.
Writersoul stated: She said that when she started to have doubts she pretty much stopped teaching or advising, if I remember correctly.
I don’t think it’s true. If you look above at what she wrote, seems to me it started way before she started teaching.