000646
Again for finding isolated fossils that can be explained by stating that looking a came from b which came from c which came from d proves absolutely nothing.
It merely says that if you do no believe in G-d and have no understanding of Maseh Bereshis and the underlying chochmah of Guf and Neshomah you are going to run into major problems that can be explained away by the Theory of Evolution.
Now that Theory itself can be crazy, have no direct proof (no there aren’t fossils of animals in transition) but the Theory is the only way for an atheist to explain the World.
But does it qualify as proof?
One of the leading books written to counter Creationism demonstrates the absurdity of stating apes and humans do not share common ancestry by demonstrating how similar various parts the DNA are.
Is that proof?
Take out any Hashkafa Sefer and read how mans guf is the same as an Animal’s in fact we just heard Koheles on Succos where the point is made again and again “Man has nothing over animals”
The difference is the neshomah not the guf.
So basically if you don’t know the Theological backbone of Judaism it’s confusing, if you do it’s not.
(BTW, scientists saying something means nothing the question is whether or not the evidence bears them out)