Purim Shtick and Chillul Hashem – A Halachic Analysis


h[By Rabbi Yair Hoffman for the Five Towns Jewish Times]

When does Purim Shtick end and Chillul Hashem begin?

Students like pulling shtick in schools during the month of Adar. Allowing four or five chickens to run around in school is extraordinarily funny. But what about the follow up? What happens afterward? What is the end plan? Is it up to the custodian to figure out what to do with chicken after the Purim prank? Is this not an extraordinary Chillul Hashem if there is no endgame plan?

Or what about an SUV pulling a wooden platform with a table, chairs, food and a mock Purim Seudah with five Chassidim singing “Ad delo yadah?” It is very funny, but is it also a Chillul Hashem?
Or how about appearing in costumes that the public might find to be racist in nature? Is that also not considered a Chillul Hashem?

Some people think that an out and out safety violation, done with no permit and clearly illegal, and one that blocks traffic – even temporarily is a Chillul Hashem.

Others would argue that when there is humor involved – there is no Chillul Hashem. But that is not necessarily the case. If a certain percentage of people are not amused and consider it dangerous and foolish – that too would constitute a Chillul Hashem.


Every Jew is commanded not to desecrate Hashem’s Name, as the pasuk states: “Lo sechalalu es shaim kodshi.” The Mitzvah is listed in the 613 Mitzvos of the Rishonim and in the Sefer haChinuch 295. Indeed, if someone causes others to make Chillul Hashems – the Shulchan Aruch rules that he should be put in Cherem (YD 334).

Clearly, even if it is on or near Purim, we should carefully weigh whatever we do to ensure that no Chillul Hashem come about because of our action.


The Rambam (Yesodei Torah 5:4) explains that Chillul Hashem is actually the opposite of Kiddush Hashem. This is a good rule of thumb to follow when one wishes to explore what exactly is a Chillul Hashem. Nonetheless, it is also important to examine what Chazal tell us specifically. The lack of clarity on the issue has created a situation where it could reasonably be said that one man’s Kiddush Hashem is another man’s Chillul Hashem.

For example, some people think that show of strength is an example of Kiddush Hashem. Others feel that an abuse of strength is, in actuality, a grave Chillul Hashem. It is thus important to see what Chazal and Poskim tell us in order to have a better gauge of the issue. It is not that this examination will resolve any issues between people who are arguing points among each other. But, hopefully, it will give a number of us greater insights.

Chillul Hashem can be categorized in different ways.

1] There are a number of different categories of Chillul Hashem that are differentiated in some of the Rishonim.

2] There are Aveiros that the Psukim in the Torah call a Chillul Hashem.

3] There are behaviors that, no matter who the Jew actually is, also constitute a Chillul Hashem.

We will begin with the three different categories found in the Rishonim.

One category is when one if forced to violate one of the three cardinal sins that we must give up our lives for. If someone did not do so, this is a Chillul Hashem according to Sefer HaMitzvos (#63).
A second category is whenever one purposefully does an Aveirah out of spite – this too is considered a Chillul Hashem (Sefer HaMitzvos, ibid).


A third category is when an important person does something that causes people to talk – even if it would generally not be considered an Aveirah (Shabbos 51b). This is considered a Chillul Hashem because people will learn from him. The Gemorah explains that greater the person is the more careful he must be.
According to the SMAG #2 and SMaK #85, however, category three is even if is not an important person but a regular Talmid Chochom whose actions cause people to talk – this too is Chillul Hashem. These authorities also say that when a Jew does any action that will cause Goyim to say, “The Jews have no Torah” – this is a Chillul Hashem.


There is actually a debate as to the reason for the third category of a great person. Is it because he has a higher standard in which to comply with? This is what Rabbeinu Yonah (Avos Mishna 4:4) and the Rambam (Maamar Kiddush Hashem) write. Others understand it because other people will learn from him. Other Rishonim hold that it is because the Torah will be lessened in the eyes of others because of him (Rashi on tractate Shabbos 33a).


What are examples of category three? The Gemorah (Yuma 86a) gives us illustrations. Rav gives an example of a Talmid Chacham that doesn’t pay the butcher bill right away. Rav Yochanan gives as an example of Chillul Hashem of a Talmid Chochom that goes without Torah and without Tefillin for 4 amos. Rav Yochanan’s explanation assumed that the onlooker does not realize that the Talmid Chochom just had a marathon session of Torah study and did not have the strength to continue further or the strength of intent to wear the Tefillin properly.

There are some observations that can be made from these illustrations. In regard to Chillul Hashem, according to Rabbi Yochanan, “perception is reality.” According to Rav, we have established the notion that it also involves a Middah, a character trait, or behavior and not just an actual sin.


There are specific Aveiros that the Torah itself specifically calls Chillul Hashem (See, for example, VaYikra 19:12). Most of these have to do with falsely swearing (shavuos) (See Rashi Taanis 23a), although giving one’s child to the Molech (VaYikra 18:21) is also called a Chillul Hashem by the Torah.
Abusing justice by the judges is also a grave Chillul Hashem.
The Gemorah will also provide Psukim that back up the idea that certain activities such as going to Goyish courts is a grave Chillul Hashem (Gittin 88b).

Anything having to with Avodah Zarah (See Rabbeinu Yona Avos 4:4 based on Yechezkel 20:39) is also considered a Chillul Hashem.


Anyone who sins and causes others to sin – choteh umachti es harabbim is actively being mechalel shaim Hashem (Rashi Yuma 86a).

Another form of Chillul Hashem is when it is pointed out to the world that Klal Yisroel is not doing their job. The Beis Yoseph explains (YD 254) that if a poor person needs to be supported through gentiles – this is a situation of Chillul Hashem. It is, in fact, forbidden for him to do so unless he has nothing to eat. Regardless, it is forbidden for us, the community, to allow the situation to continue.

If Jews are aware that someone Jewish is going to falsely swear in front of gentiles that he does not owe money, when the gentile knows that he does – this is a situation of Chillul Hashem. The Jews must stop him from swearing falsely and rather must work it out with the gentile. This is a ruling in the Ramah in Shulchan Aruch in the laws of Shvuos ( YD 239:1).

Generally speaking, we are permitted to take donations from a gentile for a synagogue. However, if the gentile gave it to something specific in shul – we may not change it for anything else because of the Chillul Hashem aspect of it. One may do so, however, under certain circumstances if the donation was made by a Jew. [TaZ’s explanation of ruling in Shulchan Aruch YD 259:6]

The Bach in a responsa (#111, old) cites the Sefer Chassidim (#829) that if it is the custom among the gentiles to forbid a certain food because a horrible sin was done with it– then Jews should also refrain from eating it. This is on account of Chillul Hashem.

Publicizing a previously performed Aveirah that was unknown may also be a form of Chillul Hashem (see Tehillim 32:1 from Yuma 86a.) Therefore, when an Aveirah is not known publically one should not say a public vidui.

Physical relations with gentiles is also considered a Chillul Hashem (Rambam Issurei Biah 12:6).

Whenever it is possible to minimize a Chillul Hashem we should do this. This is seen from many Poskim, for example, Chsam Sofer (OC Vol. I #61). One such illustration, an extreme one, can be seen from the following idea:

Even though we no longer have the ability to deal with cases of capital punishments – there are times when Bais Din must act out of Migdar Milsa, especially out of Chillul Hashem. There was such a case where a person [warning: impending euphemisim] “blessed” Hashem and he was punished most severely because of the Chillul Hashem involved (See Teshuvos HaRosh 17:8 cited in Darchei Moshe CM 425).

What is shocking about this latter illustration is that nowadays we cannot perform capital punishment and if we do, it would constitute a capital offense on us as well. And yet to prevent Chillul Hashem, Beis Din allowed it in that instance, in order to minimize the Chillul Hashem of someone “blessing” Hashem. It is this author’s belief that the very term for the prohibition is referred to by the sages as “Blessing Hashem” in order to minimize the Chillul Hashem of the entire idea. [It should be noted that nowadays this ruling of the Rosh is not applicable at all.]


The Gemorah tells us (Kiddushin 40a) Ain Makifin b’Chillul Hashem – this means that Hashem pays back (in punishment) a Chillul Hashem right away. What this means is subject to some interpretation (two views even being found in the Gemorah), but we see from all of this the gravity of Chillul Hashem.


It would seem that if even a significant minority of the public would perceive it as a Chillul Hashem – then it is – even if we personally do not think so. But regardless of our perception, it is clear that every activity or endeavor that is in the public eye should be carefully weighed to ensure that we do not violate this most fundamental principle. This should be done by asking responsible Rabbonim whose sense of achrayus to the Torah community is unimpeachable.

The author can be reached at yairhoffman2@gmail.com


  1. Exactly. You mean like Frum “askanim” publicly supporting and endorsing politicians who promote hashchasa and toaiva??? Or is one allowed to pick and choose where Chillul Shem Shomayim applies?! Interesting.

  2. I think we need an asifa by prominent speakers like reb Efraim waxman or the likes to gather all kids and teach them the severity of chillul Hashem and the beauty of kiddush Hashem. If it’s done right even if we can’t control everything it will definitely minimize the chillul hashem that goes on Purim.

  3. Implicit in Rav Hoffman’s article is the assumption that yidden are capable of exercising a modicum of common sense and a rule of reason with regard to their behavior irrespective of whether or not their actions constitute a “chilul hashem” under daas torah. The evolution of an “ad shelo yadah” mentality that excuses drinking to excess and engaging in all sorts of irresponsible behavior is not an issue of chilul hashem but one of personal responsibility.

  4. One recent Purim, I recall an article published in YWN along with accompanying photo showing a “cute” public hanging of Haman & sons “in effigy.” This was somewhere in Brooklyn, not in Bnei Brak. I recall thinking, “wow, if the neighborhood gentiles get wind of this, some of them could (understandably) think, ‘aha, so that’s what those Jews really would like to do to us…’”. Not sure if this qualified as a Chilul Hashem, but I’m sure it qualified as unbelievably stupid and shortsighted. Rabosai, a little common sense, please!

  5. Dangerous, stupid behavior isn’t necessarily a chilul Hashem. But it IS a terrible example for our kids to see. Would Bery Webber want his own children being dragged along a busy street on a piece of wood?

    Same thing with getting hammered on Purim. Why encourage outrageous drinking? In Meah Shearim a couple of years ago I saw kids – pre-Barmitzvah – smoking. Drunk bochurim & Kolel yungerleit were falling over in the street. Vomit & debris all over the already filthy streets. I will not go to Jerusalem again on Purim.

    It’s time you so-called adults show some responsibility. That video is not funny in the least: it’s pointless & it’s irresponsible.