@doomsday I am capable of understanding your statement but you’re incapable of understanding those papers. Read the article whose titled I posted twice. Just because a website claims that 157 research papers that show a link, does not mean there is a link. That website lied. Those 157 papers do not show a link. Fakhert. Many of those papers reinforce the idea that there is no link between immunization and autism. Like paper 41 of 157 for example. “Newborn screening for autism: in search of candidate biomarkers.” There’s literally nothing in the paper about vaccines, thimerisol, or anything else for that matter. The next paper “Altered urinary porphyrins and mercury exposure as biomarkers for autism severity in Egyptian children with autism spectrum disorder” deals with ethylmercury exposure. Ethylmercury isn’t found in any vaccine and never was. People may think it is because it bears a similar name to methylethylmercury, AKA thimerisol, but it’s a completely different compound.
Who lied now? Are there truly 157 papers that show a link or are there 157 random scientific studies that some science am-ha’aretz decided to throw out there claiming them to show a link?