Just Emes:
Again, not emes and, it seems, you are the one who “missed the point”.
According to this article, these rabbis somehow concluded that this would not be “denying the belief in the coming of redeemer”.
But this does not at all mean what you claim regarding the oaths.
It absolutely still was a problem of the oaths, even according to those rabbis.
But, again, regardless of this point, read the rest of the article.
There is no justification for Zionism and the State. This is getting beyond absurd.