Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › How we relate to Chillonim vs Neturei Karta › Reply To: How we relate to Chillonim vs Neturei Karta
oyyoyyoy:
I think we’ve gone back and forth on this as many times as is constructive. You think the NK should know better more than the irreligious should; I do not. Perhaps it’s time to agree to disagree.
awarenessvaad:
“Of course for a person who has been brought up frum, Bain odom lamokoim is not an extra but for others it is”
Does the fact that somebody has been brought up to believe that bein adam la’Makom is mean that we should treat it as such? And a similar argument could be made that some parts of NK have been brought up to believe that bein adam li’chavaro is “extra”. But should we, who B”H are aware of the importance of both, treat one is who is ignoring one any different than we should one who is ignoring the other?
frumnotyeshivish:
Why should a wrong that is more “relatable” be considered any less wrong? More surprising, perhaps, but why more deserving of condemnation?
Let’s say purely for arguments sake that I am tempted to become NK, and not at all tempted to abandon a religious lifestyle. Would that give me the right to be any more judgmental of the irreligious than of the NK?