“To quote your vernacular, you are pontificating. Yes there are kashas. Shkoach. Irrelevant.”
You admit that there are kashyas. Are there answers? If not then it very well might be relevant.
Of course I agree that these things need to be addressed. But the fact that there are things that require explanation doesn’t mean anything until you ask someone who is propogating the problematic shitta. And the default is that there are answers. And even if they are left off tzarich iyun, that is not a shlug up (vis-a-vis mesoras at least). The truth about the dynamics of mesoras is something that you would probably find – if what you’re saying here is any indication – very unsettling.
“So don’t follow him. Not understanding what hes talking about is a valid basis to not follow someone.”
So you agree that we should not follow R’ Chaim?
Absolutely not. Your logic again is fundamentally absurd. “Valid basis to not do” hardly suggests that one must not do. Furthermore, there are plenty of svaras that say otherwise. The sugya of whom to follow for psak is complicated, and the subject of machlokes. It cannot be said al regel achas in the CR. All I said is that you do not have to (and maybe even shouldn’t).