Reply To: Theological Conundrum (read at your own risk)

Yekke2:

It’s interesting, because I opened this thread by saying that this was inspired by a discussion I was having with someone and it happens to be that that discussion was itself a tangent of the original discussion in which I argued that there is no mechayev for morality. You seem to agree with me on that; you just feel that once G-d made his ratzon known to us, there is an inherent value in adhering to it. To which I ask “why?”

Catch Yourself:

You’re not explaining why that should be so.