I was about to make the mistake of making a detailed, logical and reasoned response to Avi K’s and ROB’s latest pontifications. But I’ve already done that numerous times, and I think I have been fair, consistent and thorough. I’ve kept it to two central issues, neither of which, unsurprisingly, have received anything with even a passing resemblance to a clear, direct answer. And if you don’t know what would consist of such an answer, perhaps, as I have repeatedly said, a Yes/No answer to a Yes/No question, particularly when the question is clearly posed, several times, with a request for such an answer. And I made it clear that such an answer should of course be elaborated on, but still be clear whether it’s positive or negative. But naturally, such simple requests have gone unheeded.
As for your latest ‘queries’, the answers to your questions have been said over and over again in my previous points (Including, if you need signposts, my concise and logical response to Avi K’s State definition quibbling, and ROB’s ridiculous failure to see the main point of my post, as already pointed out by DaasYochid). You are either unable or unwilling to see these points, or address them, despite them being as clear as day, so I see no further use in writing direct responses to waffle, especially when those responses will be ignored or blatantly misunderstood.
The responses to your above points are already contained in my earlier posts, and since you have failed to make any coherent or new points, my responses remain. If you have something that isn’t vile, pointless, waffle, pointless quibbling, incoherent and nonsensical, I’ll happily re-engage.
Yours sincerely, Neut