I have yet to see a single person disagree in a substantive way with the two obvious premises creating the numerical discrepancy.
And you have yet to prove your data in a substantive way. Why are you entitled to make comments which are facts until otherwise proven?
The argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam (“appeal to ignorance”), argument by lack of imagination, or negative evidence, is a logical fallacy in which it is claimed that a premise is true only because it has not been proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true.
Oh, and please enlighten me where agunos come into play. I see that you were discussing them in a previous post. Did you actually mean an aguna, or did you try to use a word improperly because it would grab our attention?