GAW -“Once again, without knowing what your case was I have to assume that the courts were correct.”
Of course you would, because you sound like a lawyer.
I didn’t come to ask you if they Judged me correctly.
Actually I’m Not interested in your opinion!
“TWA vs. Hardison could have been decided against Hardison based on either standard. In addition, either standard would be considered “undue hardship”.”
Why do you come here with your double talk?
I asked you a question – I’ll repeat it.
Question – “They used to post (EEOC) after the SCOTUS decision just saying it means “not more than de minimis cost”. Now they added in “or burden on business operations;”.”
When did they add it in?
I think they changed it after my Court case!!