Health
“I really don’t understand you! Are you in some sort of denial?!?”
Nope
“I posted the US Code here in this topic, right above my response to Charlie! I even put it in question marks!”
I found the code. I know the code requires reasonable accomodation as Ive been saying all along and as you conceded. That ist what we are discussing
“I proved that I was right!
Why do you keep denying this?!? Because you can’t admit that you’re wrong?!?”
No, If I’m wrong i admit, and I provided a link were I have done such.
We are discussing wheter the supreme court changes laws. You say they do. I am fairly certain you are wrong but am eager to be corrected. You have not provided a link to where scotus chnages law. Granted after a supreme court rulin ie after they explain a law that carification is sometimes ammended to the original law. But that is doen by congress not the courts. You have not provided a source that says otherwise.
At any rate as menitoned earleir, At the time of TWA v Hardison see the ruling: “the 1967 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines in effect at the time requiring an employer, short of “undue hardship,” to make “reasonable accommodations” to the religious needs of its employees” These terms where already in the law at the time. Not after.
At any rate you are wrong on two points:
a the supreme court does not ammend the law
b this law had already been ammended before the ruling