Ubiq -“There is no such rule that YWN cares about your privacy. They font want contact info given out, they dont want peoplke to try to pry/pressure people to divulge personal info. But there is no rule (that i can find) thta prevents you from giving up “your privacy” Again, you have every right to obviously. However when you said this was a rule on ywn that prevented you from revealing the court case, You are wrong.
Here are the rules again:
can you either point out the rule that prevents you from saying whcih court case you refer to. OR admit that you made up that it was against the rules?”
I made a mistake because I know that I’ve never seen anyone’s real name here so I assumed that was the rule! If it’s not – I believe you, but I’m not going to be the first. When I see others that do it, like the owner, I’ll join in. I might use a different SN.
“amazing! So we went from “what right do they have” meaning the most obvious legal right, to “moral right” to a rhetorical question about morality of their judgement.
Amazing stuff”
Actually I never meant what legal right!
When I wrote “what right?”, it was obviously a rhetorical question! Because just like in Germany, they made rules against Jews, so too here when the Congress specifically made a law to accommodate Shabbos observers – I think that was when they amended the Civil rights law in the 90’s, the courts went ahead and watered it down!
I’m not talking about their definition of “undue hardship”!
I’m sorry that you didn’t understand this in the beginning!!!