Ubiq -“”Ive admited no such thing.”
Sure you did! You can’t be that senile that you don’t even remember the post from a few lines ago!
“This too is a lie.”
What is a lie? Remember only you’re the liar around here!
“On the other hand you had said the supreme court amended it (wrong thats not what the court does), after your case (wrong you claim your case was 2006 this was in 1972 which in the real world is before 2006, though perhaps the world of secret supreme court, time works differently).”
Stop confusing yourself! Did you forget to take your Aricept today?!?
“Of course you also didnt know what gave the court the right to interpret the law. SO I find it amusing when you claim someone else is lacking in knowledge on the subject.”
The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!”
Really – so if any of your lines is a smidgen true, it wouldn’t have gone past the first federal court! It would have been thrown out as frivolous!
“This discussion was about 30 different things. And yes OVer the course of >200 posts Ive educated you somehwat on the subject and you have hopefully learnt a few things along the way (like the role of the court for example) We were Mostly focusing on how you so obviously make things up and think you are fooling anyone.”
Oh you educated me a lot about yourself! Pity though – I once thought you were smart!
Mods – you don’t need any more of his Shtus!
I know some of the posters here hang onto your every word – like it’s from Har Sinai!
Stop manipulating them!
Btw, I really want to thank you, because I haven’t searched for my court case in a long time, but because of you I did it again.
And I found out they study it in law schools!
Too bad your (make believe) friends don’t go to the famous ones!!!