I’m just saying that all sorts of assumptions, with negative connotations, are being made with no evidence.
Facts:
1: The land is owned by BMG.
2: There is a plan to develop a shopping center there.
It follows that:
The plan to develop the shopping center on land owned by BMG was proposed by the owners/decision makers of BMG.
Hence, if Rav Aaron has the final say in the Yeshiva (as I believe), he made this decision. If Rav Malkiel has the final say (as Joe says), then he made this decision. Either way, BMG has made its decision. Going against that decision means that you are going against BMG.