Ubiq -“also note: as usual you havent actually answered my question here it is again: “how does saying the words Islamic and Terrorism together help?”
I answered this already – here it is again:
“It’s not saying them together, it’s showing the terrorists that we’ll do anything to prevent your ideology!”
“Why do you think ISIS is based in Iraq?”
“Well mostly becasue they are. But ok, i’ll bite where are they based. LEt me guess on the grassy knoll or maybe in imaginary supreme court”
“I’ll post the answer below.”
“answer to what?”
This -“Why do you think ISIS is based in Iraq?”
Here it is again:
From the news yesterday:
“Former President George W. Bush has told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he was “frustrated” when the U.S. pulled troops out of Iraq in 2011, clearing the way for ISIS to be formed from the remains of Al Qaeda in Iraq.”
“Um yeah we have been safer under Obama than Bush.”
“That’s because…”
what? we were safer under Obama because Bill Clinotn dint think Islam terror was a threat. Does that make sense to you? becasue that is what you wrote.
thr bottom line is we were safer under Obaam than Bush so your critiscm of “failled liberal polcies” doesnt hold much water”
Oh, of course it does, but you’re trying very hard to disillusion everyone!
My point was – it wasn’t Bush’s fault, that we safer under Obama than him! It was the fault of his predecessor – Billy Boy!
But keep dreaming that the libs will protect us from our enemies!
“You need ground troops!”
“Yes but we still need allies in the region where basis are eg Kuwait, Saudi Arabia”
We don’t need those allies!
Iraq would have begged us to help them to defend themselves against ISIS.