GH – In your first post you wrote:
“Most women typically find some way of nursing their child in a discrete way but thats the mother’s chocie. ”
Then later, you wrote:
“However, in rare cases where circumstances dictate and there are limited options for “privacy”, better to nurse the baby than worry about Joe’s or someone else’s visual/erva fragility.”
Those are two different statements and imply completely different things. In the first post, you are saying
that women don’t have to try to nurse tzniusly and they can do what they want. That is precisely what other posters are arguing – the idea that a woman is allowed to CHOOSE to nurse untzniusly when she has the option nursing tzniusly.
In the second post quoted above, you changed your mind and decided that you are talking about RARE circumstances in which it’s NOT POSSIBLE to nurse tzniusly.
No one had said they had a problem with that – that was not the topic under discussion,
So which one are you talking about – a COMMON occurrence of women CHOOSING to nurse untzniusly, or a RARE circumstance in which it’s NOT POSSIBLE to nurse untzniusly? Those are two entirely different things. And again, it was the first one that people were taking issue with.