Forgive me, but I fail to see where u have rebutted what I said. Asserting that u find something silly is fine, but I’ve already said that the Rebbe said the Rambam is bediuk. So if if ur interpretation of the Rambam seems to have some redundant phrasing then why should I assume that’s pshat? Especially when there are cases after the Rambam where people say moshiach can come from the dead. U say “not succeed” is the same as killed. Ok, but then why write killed? And why write “kosher and complete kings of Israel that DIED” too? Why the dozens of unnecessary sentences? Ur right, it is a sensitive issue which is exactly why we shouldn’t just brush the Rambam as being repetitive and unnecessary wordy in a part that is of upmost importance. That seems a little too convienent. Not to even have to deal with the resident wording of ur pshat just because like yah kno the Rambam obvi agrees with me cause like I’m right and ur wrong and like come on, duh. Also, ur point does not deal with people who consider the Rambam to be lo zachu.
Menu