yitzchokm -“Health, read the study. The CDC statistics are based on flawed methodology.
Their methodology is like yours, you say you know two people, one a smoker and one, a secondhand smoker.
According to you, they both died of lung disease or cancer. You’re saying, that the second hand smoke caused the lung cancer. The study proves that the lung cancer was not caused by secondhand smoke.”
I’m quite perplexed – what are the purpose of all your posts?!?
Are you a smoker with a guilty complex, or do you work for Phillip Morris?
There might be some other reason that I can’t think of.
EITHER WAY – WHY DO YOU KEEP PROMOTING SMOKING & Second-hand SMOKING?!?
You found one study about Second-hand SMOKING and decided that it was the reality.
WHY?!?
Almost e/o doesn’t believe that Study – so why are you pushing it?!?
Here is another Study that is accepted by most!
“Evaluating the evidence for the relationship between passive smoking and lung cancer
Claire H. Kim, Lina Mu, […], and Zuo-Feng Zhang
Dear sir,
“No Clear Link Between Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer”—this was the title of a news article published in the December, 2013 issue, etc…
Given the vast volume of literature demonstrating the effects of passive smoking, the public health message regarding this topic should be that there is a clear link between passive smoking and lung cancer and there is no safe level of exposure.”