Your answers are simply not responding to my points. And you continue to not address them directly.
1. You are not yotzei an answer to my points.
2. I have said at least twice, that if there is even one comment, or one article, that had milim bishim, which means lashon hara, sinas chinam, whatever it is, any kind of thing that is Amir to say, it is therefore not worth the entire web site. Are we clear on that?
3. Who said anything about reinterpreting the Chafetz Chaim?
He himself has written in his sefarim how people continue to say lashon hara under the guise of it being a mitzvah, when they shouldn’t say it all, and that even if it is a case of a rasha, it is better to be shev vial taaseh than to possibly say lashon hara about the person. This is not reinterpreting anything, this is his shots. This means that in the face of being a baal lashon hara, it is better to not say anything at all.
It would be nice if you would actually address what I am saying, rather than giving an answer that seems to definately ne a response, but without having any substance to it.
We are not playing a blame game here, but that is all that seems to be available. I am talking about the ywn in general, and you continue to make it about me saying motzei shem ra, lashon hara etc.