Reply To: Liberal conspiracy

Home Forums Controversial Topics Liberal conspiracy Reply To: Liberal conspiracy

#1617494
ubiquitin
Participant

“Some people find “clinging to their guns and bibles” offensive too ”

Yes, and he shouldn’t have said that,. I’m glad we agree.

“It accomplishes that it was an act of terror as opposed to “workplace violence” and it should be dealt appropriately”

youre a bit late to the party, we are discussing the phrase “Islamic Terrorism” as opposed to “Terrorism”
We are not discussing its use as opposed to workplace violence, giving out candies or remaining silent.
I’m not sure why there is confusion on that point.

I’m not saying using that phrase would have had that result, just that their was concern that it would. Could it have been wrong? Sure
Bringing up Trump, only strengthens my point. Look how he bends over backwards to avoid condemning a murder of a journalist. no of course his business ties are more important to him than strategic alliances, so I don’t fault him for not wanting to mess up his business dealings, but bringing him as an example of how to properly condemn evil actions, doesn’t make much sense
He doesn’t mind alienating allies who support candidates who oppose him. which you seem to imply “trying to prop up the opposition as opposed to staying out of it” is a bad thing.

syag
“Was just saying that thievery done by Jews is not Thievery done for Judaism, or Torah.”

While your distinction is of course correct. I am not discussing “thievery done by Jews” again read my example carefully I would like to leave it at that,. I don’t want to go to much into detail.