Syag:
I assume you refer to the Lubavitch comparison. Yes, there are other issues at hand when Lubavitchers make that statement, but I do believe it’s enough of a problem in itself to try to enforce your leadership on others (even if it weren’t based in Meshichism and kefira).
Regarding the issue at hand, from my limited understanding, Eidah Chareidis, Satmar, and obviously Peleg do not accept R. Kanievsky’s shittah on the matter. If the Ger Rebbe and others chose to disagree also, it seems like we would end up with virtually the whole frum world on one side of the issue, and us in a corner by ourselves calling everyone else “baalei machlokes” who refuse to accept our leadership. Doesn’t that sound just a little bit eerily reminiscent of Chabad rhetoric?