Most of your post is utter nonsense and otherwise incomprehensible. Not worth responding to, except for one important point: The newspaper run by Rabbi Pischutz is STILL Anti-Lubavitch. However, Rabbi Lipschutz is drawing a crucial distinction between a movement with questionable behavior/beliefs and an individual who endured suffering and hardship-much of it unfairly. It is irrelevant which “brand” of chassidus he belonged to; a Yid needed help and Rabbi Lipschutz’s goal was to rally Klal Yisroel to obtain that help, despite the fact that he doesn’t agree with that Yid’s hashkafos. (As an important aside, THAT is a shining example of Ahavas Yisroel- I don’t accept his beliefs, but I love him as a Jew and want to help him).
Menu