Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨‍🔬💉🚫

Home Forums Controversial Topics Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨‍🔬💉🚫 Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨‍🔬💉🚫

#1642845
2scents
Participant

Dooms,

“he Fraud is that Phillipine Vaccine Schedule has only a FRACTION of ALUMINUM that the CDC Schedule has”

You know that until you do not prove what you wrote, no one will take your word for it.

“BEFORE 1992, the Fake researchers ONLY counted autistic children in HOSPITALS. AFTER 1992, the Fake researchers included autistic children who were living at HOME (outpatients)! There are TEN TIMES as
many Autistic Children living at Home then in Hospitals.”

Which Danish study are you referring to, there are a number of them, they are all very large.

I actually took the time to read the Danish study that was published in the NEJM titled “A POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF MEASLES, MUMPS, AND RUBELLA
VACCINATION AND AUTISM”
Nowhere does it state that there has been a change in 1995 on what type of patients they were focused on. furthermore, some of the same patients that have not gotten the MMR vaccine have also not gotten other vaccines, yet the rate of autism was the same.

This is the conclusion;
“There was no association between
the age at the time of vaccination, the time since vaccination, or the date of vaccination and the development of autistic disorder.”

yet you and the radical website age of autism have figured out that this is just a fraud.

maybe you are referring to this study? (JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Oct;)

“CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:
Our population-based recurrence risk estimate is lower than the recently reported estimates from clinical samples. Our results demonstrate no time trend in the ASDs recurrence risk as seen in the ASDs prevalence. The difference in the recurrence risk between full- and half-siblings supports the role of genetics in ASDs, while the significant recurrence risk in maternal half-siblings may support the role of factors associated with pregnancy and the maternal intrauterine environment in ASDs.”

Also, you do know that age of autism is not a source, you make a claim like this, you DO need to prove it.

“AFTER 1992, The Danish Government CHANGED the Definition of Autism to a more inclusive one.
THAT is ANOTHER REASON, why the number of children diagnosed with Autism Went Up!!!”

Source?
Also, are you implying that the increase in autism is due to a changed definition? if so, does this also disprove your notion that vaccines are the cause for the increase in autism?

“3. All the Researchers were Employees or had Close Connection to Vaccine Industry which they did NOT
Disclose. This is FRAUD.”

Other than they reaching conclusions and findings that are inconsistent with your belief, is there any reason that you are making these accusations?

“4. One researcher, Poul Thorson, was indicted on 22 counts of Fraud and fled USA and is on the Most Wanted Criminals List. These are the “Holy Researchers” employed by the CDC!”

First off, its Thorsen not Thorson. Second, he has stolen money from the CDC, this is not a secret and has nothing to do with his research.
Third, he was not the lead researcher on any of the studies regarding vaccines.

I have posted multiple studies that clearly show that vaccine safety has been extensively researched and all studies have come to a similar conclusion, vaccines are safe.

I am sorry that you need to resort to twisting the truth and making up facts, the rest of the world prefers to rely on real studies and not gotcha statements that are far from the truth.

Sorry if you feel offended or as an outcast, that is what people like you are. ‘Alternative’ people, that have a dislike to evidence and research-based medicine.