Dooms,
Not sure why you claim that i am ignoring your question. Your question is only based on the assumption that the MMR vaccines are only given to children that do not have signs.
This is flawed on so many levels.
A. This is a made up claim.
B. There is no way all children actually have signs that are recognized.
C. Children with siblings, are not likely to bevaccinated
Yet they do not have a lower rate of autism, they have the opposite of healthy user bias that you claim.
D. The occurrence of autism is almost the same in similar groups, the significant size of the study would make it extremely unlikely that one group had factors that would even it out with any other group, unless you cconclude that the MMR plays no factor with regards to autism.
Basically. You will never accept any conclusion that shows that the MMR plays nonrole in autism.
You earlier claimed that genetics play zero role. Yet you know claim otherwise. And now say mmr and genetics play a role.
You claimed that unvaccinated children are healthier, only because at the time it made your position look good, yet now you claim that majority of unvaccinated children are because they have signs of autism.