Dooms.
“The sibling/twin studies prove there is a Genetic Component.”
Your really funny, how is it that there is sufficient ‘proof’ that shows there is a genetic component, but not that genetics is the primary or only factor in autism?
Is that because if this were the case, then your position on vaccines would collapse?
The fact autism cannot yet be diagnosed in a blood test, does not mean that it is not genetic. Of course you will claim otherwise, yet you do not get to decide on the definitions of genetics, proof or facts.
“All you have proof is that there ARE children who are more susceptible to Autism then Others”
Correct, more like a 95% susceptibility.
“But there IS a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed study that shows that Vaccinated Kids have a much higher
rate of Autism (and other diseases). THAT IS Evidence that Vaccines Cause Autism.”
If such a study exists, it would be interesting to review it and have other epidemiologists review it as well, let it be open to the scrutiny all other studies undergo. Don’t just keep it for yourself.
“The Autism Rate from 1:10,000 (NON VERBAL) to 1:;150 (NON VERBAL) after the CDC
QUADRUPLED the Vaccine Schedule.
That is also EVIDENCE that vaccines cause Autism (and other diseases).”
its not evidence, you have failed to respond to my request that you actually prove that this is the case and to provide the numbers of percentages that were in the DSM III and DSM IV, before you do so, your guilty of what you accused others of doing when (Correctly) presenting the sharp decrease in SIDS. You are using increases in diagnosis as if they were increases in prevalences.
“All Evidence that Vaccines cause Autism (in children with a Genetic Weakness).”
Not at all, regardless of how many times you state so.