“NC, I don’t understand how you could even consider that this gemara might be agadeta.”
You have yet to tell us what gemara you are referencing. You just keep saying “the gemara,” or “that gemara.”
Meanwhile, it seems as though everyone on this thread is viewing what you’re saying as a chiddush. “The gemara says so” is not a proof. Even supplying the daf does little unless you can prove that anyone else learns it the same way as you. From you representation, it sounds like the type of sugya where chazal are discussing different versions of a verbal history (eg. Herod’s upbringing). I don’t see how that would be considered a halachic discussion, but I haven’t seen it inside.