Reply To: “Kiddush Hashem” Does Not Mean Looking Good by the Goyim

Home Forums Rants “Kiddush Hashem” Does Not Mean Looking Good by the Goyim Reply To: “Kiddush Hashem” Does Not Mean Looking Good by the Goyim

#1769688
Neville ChaimBerlin
Participant

“Fantastic! So we agree, shalom al yisroel”
I think we always did. I just think myself and others didn’t really see where you were going with your mashal.

Might I suggest this one instead: people have come to (erroneously) use the word “muktzeh” to refer to any issur on shabbos, not just the issur of muktzeh itself (eg. “you can’t carry here. There’s no eiruv; it’s muktzeh.). If a thread sought to comment on this by saying “Muktzeh does not mean any action which is assur on shabbos” it might be confusing in the way you claim.

This being said, I didn’t get the confusion with this thread. If you kept up with the YWN headlines, it was clear what it was commenting upon. It’s really gotten out of hand.