I’d like to apologize to all the other readers of this thread here.
What ubiq did, is classic democrat tactic.
Mischaracterize something that is really simple, In such a way that to bring it back to what was originally meant requires long boring monologues which really add nothing to the conversation as they were really evident all along (its like if In middle of a conversation I say 2+2=4 and someone interjects no! It’s 3 . stop lying. So you need to go now and prove simple math. Thereby losing most of the audience. And I’m the process, people walk off thinking, maybe he is right, cause the other guy didn’t really prove him wrong.)
So most of the time people just don’t bother to respond, and a clueless observer would walk away unsure who is correct.
Here though, if that happened, someone would walk away thinking (as I read what he was saying) that ubiq has brought halachik sources to allow abortion on demand.
So I spent the time and effort to show that his sources, and the conversation at hand are not the same topic.
(yes of course also to back my position that the democrat party is a party of murder.)
Menu