and someone helpfully supplied the source.”
no nobody did. The source supplied id not at all refer to infaticide
Yes actually it did. You misread it at the time, based on you comment after but I dido bother to correct you.
It said, they would resuscitate the child, and then allow the parents time to decide whether to kill it or not.
In other words, give the parents the option to kill a live baby who was born a short while ago.
As per the article, time frame not established.
That’s murder. Pure and simple. Of an infant.
Or in a single word, infanticide.
It’s what I was referring to, it’s documented, and it’s on the wish list of the more radical fringe of the democrat party, which if history is any guide, means In a few years it will be mainstream democrat party platform.
Democrats the party of murder and infanticide. It’s what I said, it’s what I meant ,and I still stand by it. All I said no the other thread is that if your getting sidetracked from my main point there, then remove infanticide from the discussion, as it’s unnecessary for my point.
I never backed off, I never changed my mind,
Menu