NO I WASN’T GOING TO ASK THAT (“Does it say anywhere ‘war crime’ is only if it’s part of a war?”)
Well, you were talking about a war crime in a non-war situation, so…
SO YOU ARE FINE WITH SOMEONE ROBBING A STORE AT GUNPOINT WHILE HOLDING THEIR CHILD IN FRONT OF THEM BECAUSE IT’S NOT A WAR OR ARMED ”CONFLICT ”?
I’m saying they could not be charged with the war crime of using human shields by a body that deals with
war crimes. (They could face a child endangerment charge from a law enforcement agency, assuming such a law exists in their country.)
You didn’t respond about the relevant issue of migrant parents’ intent.