“No Republican, ever, has said that the Republicans are an anti-science party
No not literally in those words.
“Trump is still not a typical Republican and never will be. ….t, do not reflect on the party.”
Semantics. Tes he reflects on your party. you cant elect (and support a candidate and say ” he isnt really one of us”
“And no, the hospitals were NOT overwhelmed, not even in NY.”
they were.
This was discussed on another thread. doctors did not have time to tend to all coding patients. Hence the “mandatory DNRs”
I can tell you first hand I did not have enough dialysis machines for all the patients that needed them I was forced to choose who gets dialysis and who doesn’t (there was simpley not enough machines and nurses for everyone) IT was very overwhelming. Critically ill patients were manged in hallways. You are simply wrong Look at posts from other physicians. I get it if you dont believe me. Look at Ellie Bennet’s post. Ditchek talk to any NYC doctor
you cant just dismiss facts that don’t fit your narrative. This is becoming a pattern with you.
At least with global warming yo u have “evidence” on your side fine so most scientists accept it but some hack blogs disregard it for such erudite reasons as you detailed. I can live with that. . and the side the scientists support is the “anti-science party” got it, makes sense.
but hospitals not being overwhelmed? Trump not reflecting the Republican party
amazing stuff