Reply To: George Floyd

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee George Floyd Reply To: George Floyd

#1867201
ubiquitin
Participant

Millhouse

“Again, the cops’ conversation shows that they were considering him to be in excited delirium, ”

Again, at best that lowers the charge to manslaughter. Cops can’t just assume things therby abdolve themselves.

“for which they are supposed to keep him restrained so he doesn’t flail around and hurt himself. ”

Hard to hurt yourself when your unconscious.

“And the knee hold was a CONSCIOUS hold.”

Yep read the guidelines posted above.

“He did not pass out because of the knee hold”

Well that’s just chauvins bad luck isn’t it.
And of course i assume you have your own autopsy report to back this up?

” His shortness of breath had nothing to do with the knee hold, because he was complaining of it (truly or falsely) before it was applied. ”

Certainly didn’t help.
“He died of a heart attack brought on by his health condition and his drug use, perhaps exacerbated by the stress of being arrested and restrained”

Neither autopsy report said that.

. The exact same thing would..

So you’re a Navi now?
Maybe that’s how you made up your own autopsy report?

“And he was not some good upstanding citizen ”

Immaterial.
“entitled to a presumption of innocence and good faith ”

No presumption watch the video.

r”. So he had lost his chezkas kashrus”

So have you.
Stop making things up
The video is there.
The police code of conduct is there.
The autopsy reports are there