Reply To: The Supreme Court

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee The Supreme Court Reply To: The Supreme Court

Reb Eliezer

Your conservative judge Gorsuch interpreted it giving rights to toiva. He did not interpreted as intended but as written.
As you see above we have a right to understand what the purpose of the Oral Law is. It also gives us an extended understanding to no end, yagdil Torah vyaadir whereas the written law is fixed.
As a liberal, I don’t think the Constitution was properly interpreted over here. You don’t squeeze into it an interpretation which was not intended by Congress.