burnt stake-” They are simply defining the law to protect people for their individual choices and make it harder for employers to fire an employee on a basis other than if they were competent to preform the tasks required for the job”
its an obviously false interpretation, thats why its a false ruling!!
and its obviously false because 1964 Civil rights act obviously wasn’t 1) talking about gay/lesbian, and 2) obviously doesn’t include gay/lesbian
1) because there a number of times were congress tried to pass legislation against workplace gay/lesbian discrimination since the 1964 act , so it obviously wasn’t included in the 1964 civil rights act
2) because in a case were someone hired a man and 3 months in finds out hes gay and fires him, its obviously not because the workers a man that he was fired, because he knew to begin with he was a man, so the same is when he knows to begin with hes gay and doesn’t hire him, its not because hes a man!
Menu