Reply To: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective??

Yserbius
You didn’t describe how the trial was conducted. Which patient group. Dosage information. Group size. What the statistical results were. Not sure what you by “the idea that it’s being repressed by the media is an antisemitic fake”. Not sure where that comes in. Fact is that fail to report on the obvious flaws in the many studies being touted as proof of hydroxychloroquine’s ineffectiveness. And this that you state that there is no double blind controlled study showing effectiveness -that may or may not be true-but as Dr Harvey Risch points out, nearly half of cancer treatments never underwent RCT. And considering that hydroxychloroquine is a very safe drug when given in low dosage, there is no need for RCT when there are doctors such as Dr Brian Tyson in California who treated 1700 high risk patients with this protocol-0 deaths 1 hospitalization. When nearly all countries utilizing hydroxychloroquine liberally have a far lower death rate. Yserbius, do you need a RCT to determine whether parachutes will save the life of one jumping off an airplane?
GadolHatorah
You state “doctors are free to use these drugs in individual case if they
believe…. ” you are so right on that!! The doctor -patient relationship should not be disturbed by the government! Why then have so many Democrat states restrict its use? Why have doctors been threatened if they use the drug?
Either way nobody has explained to me how all these obviously flawed studies are being used as “proof” hydroxychloroquine is ineffective.