Reply To: Election Fraud

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Election Fraud Reply To: Election Fraud

#1927823
emes nisht sheker
Participant

When you consider the company conducting the audit previously submitted affidavits that confused counties and which states they are in, I would assume whatever claims they put out about Dominion voting systems will be similarly nonsense. In any case, the machines being audited are in a Republican controlled county, the judge is also a Republican.

What the Judge said is that use of the forensic images has to be approved by him, which should mean (although not certain) that any info from the fake audit that is being done has to be approved by the Judge before being publicized. The Judge ordered this because the Secretary of State raised legitimate issues here. Without this, Michigan, can likely be sued by Dominion for breach of contract for not taking action to prevent the release of information that was contractually agreed to be kept private. There is also the issue that someone may be able to find a way to hack the software and impair future elections, so restricting info on how the software works might be beneficial (e.g. Apple takes this approach. Google on the other hand is much more open with how their software works and attempts to improve security by fixing flaws that people find. It is arguable depending on the exact facts and circumstances which approach is better).

I guess, you can read into this all sorts of conspiracies, but this is actually pretty typical stuff and courts deal with this all the time. Let’s put it this way, if they can prove the software is designed to allow fake election results, then any contract provision preventing release of that info would be found void and you can spread that on the news all you want. That would be a very serious claim. The simple reason why that claim is likely nonsense, is so far in every recount in any State that has done one there has not been any significant discrepancy. Also, you will know that claim may have some merit if the court actually agrees with them. If the court rules against them and they make the claims they found serious problems, well then I would simply assume they are mixing up Counties and State again and nothing they say is reliable.