Ubiq -“To which you replied (as late as Jan 7 !!!) that she was still “… going to SCOTUS and I even posted the 2 case numbers here, because you were too Lazy to look for them yourself!” (note NOT that she went already and submitted her briefs, but that there would still be a hearign in the old, ordinary defintion of the word)”
Let me ask you something – Do you have a problem understanding simple posts?!?
She put all her proofs in her Files/Motion.
Yet you keep posting to me -“The lie I identified was that she claimed she would release evidence “soon” and “soon” had already past”.
So either you are too Lazy to read the File or you can’t understand my Simple Posts!
“To which I replied, that no her case would never be heard
To which You called me a liar.”
Unfortunately you don’t have any understanding of Legal terms, but you continue to Argue that you are Right.
Is it because that you have a Lot of Gaiva?!?
I tried to explain this before to you – if the SCOTUS decides that a case is Moot – that is a judgment.
That means that they read/heard the Case before them!
This is from Wikipedia, but I looked at a lot of Legal sites and it’s almost identical:
“In the U.S. federal judicial system, a moot case must be dismissed, there being a constitutional limitation on the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The reason for this is that Article Three of the United States Constitution limits the jurisdiction of all federal courts to “cases and controversies”. Thus, a civil action or appeal in which the court’s decision will not affect the rights of the parties is ordinarily beyond the power of the court to decide, provided it does not fall within one of the recognized exceptions.”