@jackk I guess the puzzle is too hard, so here goes:
>The stupid whataboutism defense put forth by defenders of trump was that trump can never be held accountable for his actions until the BLM rioters are prosecuted.
That is moronic.<
Wrong.
When “defenders of trump” use the “what about BLM” defence, they are not asking for prosecution, they are asking for a single-standard.
To Dems that phrase has no meaning.
That is moronic.
>It is obvious that you and MadeAliyah did not listen to the trial.
Was OJ’s trial also a PR stunt since it was clear that the minority population was never going to convict him ? They came back with a verdict after an hour.<
Wrong.
I did listen to the trial.
How does OJ’s trial have anything to do with this?
>The Senate trial did not get the conviction of trump but it did convict 43 republicans of supporting insurrection <
Wrong.
The Republicans who voted not to convict were not “supporting insurrection”, they did not believe Trump was guilty of inciting it, as the case against him was very weak.
>and allowing every future president free reign after he is a lame duck to overthrow the government.<
Wrong again.
A President who tries to “overthrow the government” will be prosecuted. Trump didn’t come close to doing that.
>MAGA<
Indeed.