Reply To: Lindsey Graham’s Stupid Argument

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Lindsey Graham’s Stupid Argument Reply To: Lindsey Graham’s Stupid Argument

#1949640
ubiquitin
Participant

KY

“Your evading my point.”

I’m not.
I’m showing that your point can’t be true. Since practically it wouldn’t work.
Laws are by definition practical. Having a law that if *** thinks the Government is tyranical he/she/they have the right to use force to overthrow it. With *** being an entitiy to be deteriiiiend later Is not a law any country would have .

If you think it is fine.
That is our disagreement .

“I’m not the one who made the law. It’s on the books. ”

You are and its not.
There is no such law on the books. There have been over 200 years of Court cases. Can you provide ONE court opinion, even a rejected minority opinion that gives people that interprets the 2nd amendment as giving a right to overthrow the government think the government?

In fact even the 1st amendment is somewhat limited when it comes to talk of overthrowing the government see the Smith act and US code 18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government” Now while SCOTUS in Yates Vs. US did interpret The SMith act more narrowly (that abstract talk of overthrow the Government was ok) They did not overturn the entire law as being against the 2nd amendment. In fact he second amendment isnt even mentioned in the decision decisions.

“Is blm also correct?”
you say “Cute what you did there” I’m not sure what you mean, that was my only question to you, from the get go. but I got my answer “If they are part of the terrible issue, then yes. ” thanks.

“So what about a six inch steak knife? I don’t know. ”

Here’s the thing, I DO know. The court decides. period. That is the answer to your question. ITs simple really. I’m not sure why you find mine more challenging

“A-ha! Got you! If you can’t answer that, obviously your not clear on the issue!”
nope you didn’t get me. and I can answer it . In fact the The answer to your question is crystal clear so much so, I’m surprised you even asked it . It has to be otherwise society couldn’t function. yo u cant have a system where each individual person decides what mode of attack deserves lethal force nor what constitutes a tyrannical government .