Ubiq -“Still not following, why is a clarification “way before” worse than one that occurs later? (and yours only occurred becasue I called you out on violating the nonsensical rule you invented)”
On Jan. 7, you clarified what you meant at that time.
But on Jan. 19 you wrote this:
“The case will not be heard.”
Who knows what you meant at that time?
Your statement could be this:
“I acknowledged that I was making a prediction that could be wrong”.
And it could be a “Lie of Fabrication”.
No one knows what you meant on Jan. 19, but you want e/o to assume that you meant the same thing what you posted on Jan.7.
It’s extremely Absurd to think e/o knows what you meant without clarification!
The way things work, if you aren’t trying to manipulate people, is to clarify your statements!
I actually think you were doing a “Lie of Fabrication”, but your trying to get out of it by further using Manipulation Tactics!