Number one you are completely ignoring the 1905 Jacobson v Mass which all the pro vaxxers try to bring up, I included this in my post and proved that he wasnt forced to vaccinate at the end and the court case was about paying a fine since he refused the vaccine.
“1) You are free to buy all the food you could possibly want even if unvaccinated .”
-Yes for the time being. Did you think they would take that away from you on the first day? We all know where this is going. Take away the luxuries like Dining and Gym,where people can live without but in the meantime get them used to the idea of restrictions so that they can go for the real necessities once the people are conditioned to this.
““Driving is not a necessity ”
1) In my isolated town it is”
-Then get a drivers license. Last time I checked you said you dont want to get a drivers license because you believe they are all killers.
Getting a license requires certain knowledge and skill and training. Going to a restaurant or museum or buying food, does not. With your ideology you should also have a right to practice medicine without a license because whats the difference between practicing medicine and going to a restaurant right? Maybe you can also become a surgeon without years of study and practice? No knowledge needed besides for the fact that its your right and that should be good enough for you to perform surgeries.
You have a right to study whatever you want that doesnt mean you are “Qualified” until you actually are Qualified. Qualification does not equate to freedom to dine out, go to a museum, etc.
If anything you are proving my point.
Your second example is even weaker. You have a flawed mindset that you dont need something due to the fact you werent born with it. You also werent born with an endless supply of food in your stomach so maybe you shouldnt ever eat anything?
You are totally mixing up so many things and drawing for straws. Your last argument is already getting into ethics, morals and a bunch of other topics. That has no comparison to forcing someone to get vaccinated in order to live in society. And yes Deblasio said, “if you want to “PARTICIPATE” in society, you will need to get vaccinated, we will make life very difficult for the unvaccinated”.
You are aware also that there is no end to the vaccination right? There will be constant booster shots as they have already warned. Aside for the fact that this sets a precedent for any vaccine they will deem necessary for people to get in the future or any other “virus” that shows up.
Your first example is that you argue that things that require qualification shouldnt, and your second argues against morals and ethics in public. This has nothing to do with the current issue. Totally separate subjects.
2scents-“Your using the notion of the vaccine being less protective against different strains or variants of the virus has nothing to do with protecting others. ”
-Actually it does. You are completely ignoring those with natural antibodies which are proving to not only be long lasting, but also protect against variants. Whats your excuse to have them vaccinated when the vaccine does not prevent spread to others or protect against variants? Because that was the only excuse they came out with to require immune people to get vaccinated but im sure they have no shortage of new theories. ALL FOR THE GREATER GOOD!