Reply To: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher

when I admitted to the posters that I’m ignorant with regard to learning having started relatively late in life. You twisted what I said to read, “You admit you’re ignorant about Lubavitch”

Let’s do the whole “you said, I said” thing to clear this up:

In connection to the nevuah question, you said:
“The answer is simple because there was never any question of the Rebbe being a Novi while he was alive. This is nothing but an invention of his followers. What I believe the Rebbe did say, because I heard this from a Lubavicher, is…”

I pointed out how silly it is to argue with me about what the Rebbe did or didn’t say, when it’s printed clearly (and shared link).

[Happens to be a sicha from this week. Ask any slightly knowledgeable Lubavitcher what the Rebbe said on parshas Shoftim 5751, and he’ll tell you (if he’s not afraid of being open with you) that the rabbeim are nevi’im etc.]

You excused yourself by saying that you don’t have any time to actually study the Rebbe’s writings.

I countered that being ignorant about Chabad isn’t an excuse to attack it. Better use the little time you have learning the topic, not arguing the topic.

Sorry if I came across as trying to twist the truth.