Reply To: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher

Part of what they published – and I have copies, and have checked both sources. – the atzmus melubash beguf sicha, and the same sicha printed in a later volume, with the offensive passage redacted.
If there’s nothing wrong with it, why was it redacted and never reprinted in its original form?

You’ve mentioned this before, and it really annoys me, because if it were true it would mean that Chabad already admitted that it was wrong, which renders the whole discussion pointless.

I have the 1962, 1985 and 2021 versions of Likkutei Sichos in front of me right now, and all of them have it written exactly the same.
I’m either misunderstanding something, or your lying, or you heard it from someone who was lying, or saw a forged version.
Please explain yourself.

P.S.
I’m not going to get into this whole discussion of why this isn’t avoda zorah chas v’shalom. Just as someone who holds of the Minchas Elozor, Noam Elimelech, Zohar and Gemara will attempt to understand and interpret their statements properly, while the haters can misunderstand and hate – the same is with the Rebbe.
I have demonstrated this clearly in this post:

Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher

Qwerty,
I’m still waiting for someone to explain why it’s permissible to defend and interpret these statements, despite them sounding like AZ if taken at face value, as opposed to the Rebbe’s statements may not be interpreted.